The first question shopkeepers with till software ask: "does it need to be integrated with my system?". The answer is no, and that is not a limitation, it is a deliberate architecture choice.
What a POS integration costs
Loyalty solutions integrated into the till inherit all the constraints of the till: compatibility to check (and there are dozens of systems), installation by a technician, updates that break things, extra screens for the team, training, dependence on the POS publisher. For a network whose shops do not all have the same payment system, integration becomes a project in its own right: long, costly, fragile.
The Lecy architecture: next to the till, not inside it
- Deployment: place the tag. Live the day it is received, including in a network with mixed systems.
- Maintenance: none. No updates on the shop's side, no possible breakdown on the till's side.
- Team: no new screen, no handling. The till stays exactly what it was.
- Changing POS: the shop can switch till software tomorrow, the loyalty programme does not move.
"But then, how is the point reliable without the till?"
It is the tap that counts, not the receipt. Each tap generates a unique, encrypted, short-lived link: the proof that the phone was physically at the counter at that moment. The shopkeeper also sets the minimum delay between two points, so that one visit equals one point. Reliability comes from cryptography and physical presence, not from a line on a till receipt, and that is precisely what makes deployment so simple.